Washington

Notice to the People of Washington

Our printed Notice says, “Check our sources.” Here they are.

Below is the Notice exactly as printed. After it, each of its six footnotes is set out word for word, with the line it supports and free links to the law itself.

The Due Process Project’s yellow Notice to the People of Washington. RE: Your Constitutional Rights. Your constitutional protections have been legislated out of family court. Raising your children is a fundamental right protected at the highest level by the U.S. Constitution. URGENT. Everyone must know what is happening to our rights in Washington family court. 1. Easy to restrict. At one of the lowest evidence standards in the law. 2. Hard to escape. At one of the highest evidence standards in the law. 3. Hard to appeal. Decisions are generally reviewed on appeal under one of the most deferential standards of review. 4. It can reach anyone. You don’t have to file. If the petition names you, you are in. Who decides your future: With this little rigor required, the story the judge believes can decide your future. The Constitution says the state answers to you. In family court, you answer to the state. Know your rights. Stay out of family court if you safely can. Safety first: if you or your children are in danger, call 911 or the National Domestic Violence Hotline, 1-800-799-7233. Learn your rights. Check our sources. thedueprocessproject.org. The six source footnotes are set out on this page below the Notice.
The Notice as printed. Tap the image to open it full size.

Check it yourself: the six footnotes

Each footnote is copied word for word from the Notice. The links go to free public copies: the Library of Congress, the National Archives, the Washington State Legislature, Washington Courts, and the Caselaw Access Project at Harvard Law School.

Footnote 1: a fundamental right

The Notice says. “Raising your children is a fundamental right protected at the highest level by the U.S. Constitution.”

The footnote. Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 720–21 (1997); Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65–66 (2000) (plurality).

Read it.

Footnote 2: easy to restrict

The Notice says. “Easy to restrict. At one of the lowest evidence standards in the law.”

The footnote. RCW 26.09.191(4)(a) (no standard of proof stated); Cowan v. Cowan, 29 Wn. App. 2d 355, n.4 (2023) (trial court applied preponderance standard to a request for RCW 26.09.191 limitations).

Read it.

Footnote 5: who decides your future

The Notice says. “With this little rigor required, the story the judge believes can decide your future.”

The footnote. Chandola, 180 Wn.2d at 650 n.5 (“credibility determinations are for the trial court”); id. at 642 (findings “are treated as verities on appeal, so long as they are supported by substantial evidence”).

Read it.

Footnote 6: you answer to the state

The Notice says. “The Constitution says the state answers to you. IN FAMILY COURT, YOU ANSWER TO THE STATE.”

The footnote. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1; Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 747–48 (1982) (due process requires at least clear and convincing evidence before a State may sever parental rights).

Read it.

Know your rights

Learn your rights: our free Family Court Playbooks are on the Resources page.

Safety first: if you or your children are in danger, call 911 or the National Domestic Violence Hotline, 1-800-799-7233.

The Due Process Project is a nonprofit civic education organization. We do not provide legal advice or represent individuals. This page is general education, not legal advice.